How does the brainstorming framework differ from traditional meeting discussion methods?

There are several differences between the Brainstorm framework and traditional meeting discussion methods.

1. Free flow: Within the Brainstorm framework, participants are encouraged to freely express their ideas without any constraints, offering various creative suggestions and proposals. In contrast, the traditional meeting format may be limited by time constraints, facilitators, or other participants, hindering the full exploration of divergent ideas.
2. Brainstorming emphasizes the idea that “two heads are better than one,” encouraging participants to collaborate, inspire each other, and collectively generate more valuable ideas. Traditional meeting discussions may lean more towards focusing on certain individuals’ opinions and neglecting the ideas of others.
3. Open-mindedness: The Brainstorm framework encourages participants to maintain an open mindset, accepting various opinions and suggestions without easily dismissing any ideas. Traditional meeting discussions may be more serious and formal, with participants often leaning towards consensus and uniformity, overlooking diverse viewpoints.
4. Innovation-driven: The Brainstorm framework emphasizes innovation and breakthrough, encouraging participants to think about future possibilities and solutions. Traditional meeting discussion methods often focus more on solving current issues and challenges, lacking exploration and innovation for the future.